Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: TMGnyc 11:31 am EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: Working is a success at City Center - huskyital 11:16 am EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| I would highly disagree that the show is a success. The rewrites about the City Center employees have no bite to them and no real purpose. Without any female executives or women talking about their jobs beforehand, Just A Housewife seems inconsequential. Yes, Helen Hunt can sing, but she had trouble acting while she sang because she was concentrating so hard. Her monologues were fantastic. The sound design, once again, marred the evening with the band overpowering many of the vocals. I was center Grand Tier where the should should have been perfect. Why were some of the songs done with a standing microphone while others done on a body mic? There was no rhyme or reason for it - and it marred Cleaning Women because Tracie Thoms was stuck behind that microphone for no earthly purpose. Javier Munoz was stuck in the back behind the band on a microphone for Fathers and Sons - why????? Sorry, but this had bad staging with perfunctory musical direction. Thank goodness the performers are as wonderful as they are. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: 37Rubydog 01:23 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - TMGnyc 11:31 am EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| For whatever reason, it always takes CC a couple of performances to iron out the sound balance. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Last Edit: Chromolume 12:33 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| Posted by: Chromolume 12:32 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - TMGnyc 11:31 am EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| Without any female executives or women talking about their jobs beforehand, Just A Housewife seems inconsequential. Interesting point. In the standard rental versions of the show, "Just A Housewife" has come out of several different transitions. Originally it came out of the monologue for the Gas Man (or later UPS Man), who had a short moment with the Housewife to start the scene (and she starts the song once he's offstage). In the 2012 revision, it follows a scene with two telephone operators - then we see the housewife picking up the phone to deal with a newspaper sales call, explaining that her husband gets the paper at work, and then trying to explain that yes, she also works, but at home. Transition into song. So the song has never really been part of a sequence about women at their jobs (save that one of the phone operators is female). But you have a good point that the song might resonate differently if it was. From the descriptions I've seen about this production so far (the new monologues, the restoration of "Lovin' Al" etc), it sounded to me that it would certainly run longer than 90 mins (approximately the running time of the one-act 2012 version). But I guess they've kept it streamlined. I'm a big admirer of Working in general, and in fact I just recently finished doing my 2nd production of the 2012 version, and had a fantastic time, with an insanely talented college cast. But it seems to me that this show has always had as many detractors as supporters, and if the presentation at City Center is sloppy, that's not good. But hopefully things will tighten up and maybe even change as the week goes on. We all know they're essentially throwing these things together, and I wonder if that's ultimately doing more harm than good. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: TMGnyc 12:37 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - Chromolume 12:32 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| Chromolume, it's not so much what happens directly before the Housewife scene as much as we have seen powerful women previous. We we given female exec's and powerful women previous to the housewife scene. She still has the phone conversation but now we laugh because it's just an annoyance call. As an audience, we see no reason for her to be so apologetic about being a housewife. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: Chromolume 12:41 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - TMGnyc 12:37 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| I can agree with that. I always thought the original transition was better (as much as I like the 2012 version, I definitely miss many things about the original). Originally, the song starts with her as if she were talking to Terkel or an interviewer like him - she's a bit surprised that he would want to interview someone that doesn't "work" in the conventional sense. It seems a bit more natural than the explanation in the new version. (And the lyric "if you'd rather, it can wait" also makes more sense in that context.) |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: larry13 12:22 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - TMGnyc 11:31 am EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| I didn't see this production and won't, mainly because I saw a decent version in Phoenix this past winter and I just don't think these wonderful songs add up to a satisfying musical. But if "Just A Housewife seems inconsequential," something is seriously wrong. In the right hands(definitely the OBCR and several cabaret settings), this song packs an overwhelming wallop--or should. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree | |
| Posted by: Chromolume 12:38 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Working is a success at City Center - Highly Disagree - larry13 12:22 pm EDT 06/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| I took "inconsequential" to mean that it seemed to come out of nowhere, rather than the song having no impact. I agree that the song is - or certainly should be - an emotional wallop when done right. I always get chills in the moment where the ensemble stops singing and the soloist is left to hold that long note ("does") - that huge moment of power all of a sudden becoming very stark. Very dramatic. Also, of course, the realization at the end with "like my mother." Carnelia is an amazing writer. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.036212 seconds.