Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: i Did see that yesterday on gma | |
| Posted by: Esther 04:59 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: i Did see that yesterday on gma - dramedy 04:44 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| her last comment re: see how long that lasts certainly certainly points to that, but her ridiculous pronunciation of "ballet" & tone before that line read very differently to me and more in line with the reactions she is getting. Don't care if she gets canned. She was not a pleasant person in my only encounter with her back in her WABC days. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: i Did see that yesterday on gma | |
| Posted by: portenopete 05:30 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: re: i Did see that yesterday on gma - Esther 04:59 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| I'm very curious top know the details of your "only encounter with her back in her WABC days". Just because she's not friendly to people who might accost her on the street or talk to her at a party or at a ball game does not mean she should be fired from her job. |
|
| reply to this message |
| Did not accost her. Did not even approach her- just observed her. | |
| Last Edit: Esther 05:58 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| Posted by: Esther 05:56 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: re: i Did see that yesterday on gma - portenopete 05:30 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| Worked for a national retailer that had just announced they were going out of business & my assistant manager refused to talk to her on camera, nor allow her to interview anyone else who worked in the store. he was polite, but firm. She essentially laughed in his face & told him he deserved to be fired. Nasty, condescending , etc. Yeah, no love lost for her in my life. I care as much about her job security as she cared about my assistant manager's. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| All fine reasons to dislike her.... | |
| Posted by: portenopete 11:21 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: Did not accost her. Did not even approach her- just observed her. - Esther 05:56 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| ....but again: not justification for firing her. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: i Did see that yesterday on gma | |
| Posted by: TGWW 05:47 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: re: i Did see that yesterday on gma - portenopete 05:30 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| Well, why don't you skedaddle over to the ABC studio in Times Sq on Monday morning and ask the producers why they reduced her schedule from five days a week to three, six months ago. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: i Did see that yesterday on gma | |
| Posted by: portenopete 05:55 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: re: i Did see that yesterday on gma - TGWW 05:47 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| LOL. I can't imagine that it's because she's not a "pleasant" person. Presumably her ratings are slipping. The traditional reason for any kind of demotion or termination. Perfectly legitimate. That is until the most recent years when forty-year comments made when drunk at a party are now being used as reason to lose your career. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: i Did see that yesterday on gma | |
| Posted by: TGWW 08:38 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
| In reply to: re: i Did see that yesterday on gma - portenopete 05:55 pm EDT 08/23/19 | |
|
|
|
| OK then. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.019712 seconds.