Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Was Diahann Carroll ever offered Sunset Blvd. on Broadway? | |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 10:21 am EDT 08/25/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Was Diahann Carroll ever offered Sunset Blvd. on Broadway? - Teesh 08:32 am EDT 08/24/19 | |
|
|
|
| "In Carroll's autobiography THE LEGS ARE THE LAST TO GO she devotes a chapter to the SUNSET experience, saying Andrew Lloyd Webber was unhelpful in her getting the role in Toronto to the point of being obstructive and she firmly believes he did not want an African American actress playing Norma Desmond." It could be that he did not want an African American actress in the role, or it could just be another example of his absolutely horrendous record in terms of having no idea what he wants in terms of casting -- see also Patti LuPone and Faye Dunaway in SUNSET, Madonna in the film of Evita |
|
| reply to this message |
| Cher? | |
| Posted by: bobby2 11:12 pm EDT 08/25/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Was Diahann Carroll ever offered Sunset Blvd. on Broadway? - Michael_Portantiere 10:21 am EDT 08/25/19 | |
|
|
|
| I've read somewhere (not sure if it was here) that Cher was about to do Toronto but backed out. Someone always insists it was true. That could be his disappointment with Caroll. He thought he was getting a bigger star. I remember Theatreweek or whatever that magazine was got a hold of a list the casting person made for people to replace Close in L.A. It was mostly actresses, stars with little or no musical experience (hence Dunaway.) People like Sally Field. When he was first casting ALW mentioned Liza and Shirley MacLaine as possibilities. Somewhere along the way he seemed to decide to go with singers (Buckley, Paige, Petula Clark) over star names. The star names maybe would have made it more fun to see over and over. Odd how Dunaway's ticket sales were so bad supposedly. Has Rex Smith ever spoken about the show? He must have rehearsed pretty closely with Faye. Odd how they have managed to keep gossip about her performance so quiet all these years. |
|
| reply to this message |
| Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. | |
| Last Edit: Delvino 02:35 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| Posted by: Delvino 02:34 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| In reply to: Cher? - bobby2 11:12 pm EDT 08/25/19 | |
|
|
|
| Was it Frank Rich or David Richards who talked about the vocal demands blocking the casting of ideal candidates like MacLaine? I recall reading that take, how the Norma arias demand the big soaring voices. The Close model -- actor with decent but not stellar singing -- wasn't duplicated as often as people expected. Even Clark still brought a powerful pop instrument in the part. I also read the Cybil Shepard wanted the role desperately. As funny as that sounds, she can sing, and it's not hard to picture her pulling it off. Sally Field, however, mentioned here, makes me giggle. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| Close's voice is much better than "decent but not stellar" | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 09:38 am EDT 09/03/19 | |
| In reply to: Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. - Delvino 02:34 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| Perhaps it's *inconsistent*, but she has a stellar voice. I will admit I never saw her live in the original run, but in videos and on the recording I think her voice sounds fantastic. Whether you like the voice or not compared to other options is another debate, but I know actors with "decent" voices who couldn't come CLOSE to what Close did let alone being able to even take on that score every night, or even once for a recording. Meryl has a decent but not stellar voice. Close has an excellent voice. Buckley has an amazing voice. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Close's voice is much better than "decent but not stellar" | |
| Posted by: Billhaven 11:05 am EDT 09/03/19 | |
| In reply to: Close's voice is much better than "decent but not stellar" - Chazwaza 09:38 am EDT 09/03/19 | |
|
|
|
| Her voice in performance was less than stellar. She had consistent pitch issues, a terrible mix of head and chest (see Forbidden Broadway) and was straining throughout. I also thought her portrayal was closer to Carol Burnett than Gloria Swanson. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. | |
| Last Edit: EvFoDr 03:15 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| Posted by: EvFoDr 03:12 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| In reply to: Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. - Delvino 02:34 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| I don't recall reading anything about that, but it really makes perfect sense, especially now with hindsight. Speaking for myself, I was overjoyed at the time to have LuPone reunite with ALW to belt the hell out of one of his scores. But it's clear now that many of the great candidates for this role would have required a less demanding vocal part. And it was certainly disappointing to me (and some, though clearly not others) to hear even a decent singer like Close approach the score after hearing LuPone do it. I still laugh (tinged with sadness) when I hear the key change DOWN at the end of With One Look so the song can conclude on what I assume was a more manageable note for Close to belt out powerfully. I assume, from recordings though I didn't see them live, that Buckley and Paige delivered the score. But they aren't big box office and certainly don't have any ties to Hollywood like a Close, Shepard, Dunaway, Carroll, MacLaine did, which adds an extra layer to the proceedings. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| Close was electric in LA | |
| Posted by: bobby2 09:54 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. - EvFoDr 03:12 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| I've never seen anything like it. Her vocal deficits whatever they were didn't matter because she brought such an amazing madness and an antic comedy to the role. (I've never seen anybody else get as many laughs from it. Even Close in the revival couldn't do it.) She just connected with that role so deeply like with Fatal Attraction that it was just stunning. Makes me wonder if Dunaway could have brought that hysteria to it. By the time it got to NYC the first time she was a bit 'big" but those first few months in LA were unlike anything I've ever witnessed on stage. Shear brilliance. One thing that I think that gets distorted in Patti's whole stuff about how a movie star swept in and stole her role is that Close was in a career slump at this time. I doubt ALW ever thought in a million years that Close a faltering movie star who hadn't had a hit in a few years would give a more acclaimed performance than the woman who dazzled as Evita. I always felt Close did the role in LA (where she didn't live) in order to try and restart her film career. Being away from the New York spotlight probably enabled her to give a bold take on the role........and it worked. Close's trips up and down those stairs was a show in itself. It was like she came up with a mood for each one and each trip was like a little one act play. Plus she took the curtain call in character. Never broke. She bowed as the desperate Norma bowing to her people out there in the dark. Excellent. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Close was electric in LA | |
| Posted by: EvFoDr 10:25 am EDT 08/27/19 | |
| In reply to: Close was electric in LA - bobby2 09:54 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| Thanks for sharing. I had nearly forgotten that I had tickets to see Close in LA but my trip was thwarted by the earthquake in 1994. Perhaps if I had seen her there my feelings would be different. And to be fair LuPone is my favorite musical theatre diva so she was going to be a touh act to follow for me. By the way I have no investment at all in this whole idea that Close stole the role from LuPone. I just simply want to hear a bigger voice sing the score. But by many accounts, including your above, Close was quite special live, and I don't doubt it. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Close was electric in LA | |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 10:44 am EDT 08/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Close was electric in LA - EvFoDr 10:25 am EDT 08/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| What sometimes gets overlooked in this LuPone v. Close conversation is that Close was playing a different version of the show than LuPone ever got to do. The show was revised for LA and those revisions did not go into the London production until Buckley took over from LuPone. So I've always wondered if LuPone was handicapped from the start by having to play an inferior version of the piece. Or, to invert that thought, was Close's performance always going to be superior because she was starting with a better version of the material? I have friends who saw the show in London and loved Patti for exactly the reason you state...that the role really works with a big voice. But I'd also heard that LuPone's best performances as Norma were at the tail end of her run, in the immediate aftermath of finding out that she'd been replaced for New York. So maybe LuPone just didn't find that extra "IT" factor in the role until it was too late. In any case, I've never understood the, apparently since buried, animosity that LuPone had for Close. Close didn't hire herself for the role. She was a actress who was offered a job and decided to take it. If she'd declined, there's still no guarantee that Andrew Lloyd Webber, et al would have brought LuPone to New York in the role if they were unhappy with her performance in some way. Although, I wonder if LuPone, given the revised material and, perhaps, some different direction from Trevor Nunn, based on his experience with Close in LA, would have been able to revise her performance in such a way that she would have gotten the acclaim that Close did. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Close was electric in LA | |
| Posted by: EvFoDr 12:59 pm EDT 08/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Close was electric in LA - JereNYC 10:44 am EDT 08/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| What a tantalizing notion that LuPone could have improved in the new production! Although weren't most of the changes not related to the core Norma material, aside from whatever adjustments were made for Close's vocal abilities? Like, does the addition of Every Movie's a Circus (a horrible song in my opinion) for the ensemble make the show better and improve the Norma experience? I think you have to take LuPone's animosity with a grain of salt. It's not rational, but her thinking was no doubt clouded by the anger and sadness she felt being from being fired. You'll notice if you read her book that she holds (or held) a lot of grudges. And this it the theatre and people are dramatic. I suppose there is a world in which LuPone could have been terribly rational and said: well of course Glenn Close was just taking a job she was offered, I can see beyond my own situation and acknowledge that. But that would have been awfully clear headed. Maybe unrealistically so. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Close was electric in LA | |
| Last Edit: JereNYC 01:39 pm EDT 08/27/19 | |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 01:39 pm EDT 08/27/19 | |
| In reply to: re: Close was electric in LA - EvFoDr 12:59 pm EDT 08/27/19 | |
|
|
|
| I'm actually not familiar enough with the material to know exactly what the changes were for LA. But, even if all the Norma material was identical or nearly so, the fact that the show played better in the revised version (as per the creatives who, of course, thought it did) would have likely reflected on Close and every other aspect of the production. Is it better to be the one bright spot in a terrible show or the shiniest bright spot in a good show? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| I didn't see her in LA, but in London and the New York revival... | |
| Posted by: DanielVincent 11:07 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| In reply to: Close was electric in LA - bobby2 09:54 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| ...I would rank her performance as pretty much the best thing I've ever seen anyone do in anything anywhere. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| I remember an Entertainment Tonight segment announcing that Cybill Shepard... | |
| Posted by: GabbyGerard 03:02 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
| In reply to: Some early reviews noted that the score eliminated too many perfect choices. - Delvino 02:34 pm EDT 08/26/19 | |
|
|
|
| ...had been offered the role on the West End later in its run, somewhere after Paige but before Moreno. I also remember hearing or reading--though I can't say where--that negotiations fell apart because they wouldn't meet her price. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.038628 seconds.