LOG IN / REGISTER




re: I saw it twice.
Posted by: AlanScott 07:10 am EDT 10/16/19
In reply to: re: I saw it twice. - JereNYC 01:11 pm EDT 10/15/19

I was just listening to it. I think the recording generally has an electronic, tinny quality. There is some distortion on a couple of her high notes. I'm not sure that there really was an equivalent of auto-tuning back then, but I may be wrong. It could be that there was a tape splice, and that the highest part was recorded in a different room and spliced in with the rest, resulting in a different sound quality there, but I rather think that it's just the sound of her particular voice up high.
reply

Previous: re: I saw it twice. - JereNYC 01:11 pm EDT 10/15/19
Next: re: I saw it twice. - TheOtherOne 09:52 am EDT 10/16/19
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.009915 seconds.