LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: re NFP
Posted by: NewtonUK 04:40 pm EST 02/20/20
In reply to: re: Lucy Barton thoughts? - JereNYC 12:53 pm EST 02/20/20

Yes and no. The whole point for alllowing theatres to be not for profit (charitable) organizations under IRS Code 501(c)(3), was to provide a service that no one else was provbiding, and at an affordable price. One donated to a theatre so one could see Chekhov or Ibsen in Cleveland at an affordable price.

Now that, at least in NY, the not for profit theatres with Broadway outlets - 2d STage, MTC, and Roundabout - are doing mostly the same work that commercial producers would, and could do - with preferential union contracts, and an attraction for stars - you get a limited run in a show - so sucess failure is not on your back - but you are still on Broadway and awards eligible.
reply to this message


sorry, but no
Posted by: ryhog 06:57 pm EST 02/20/20
In reply to: re: re NFP - NewtonUK 04:40 pm EST 02/20/20

You are dead wrong about the point. This has been explained to you before but you don't seem interested in fact for fiction, or reading the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder, or even one of the hundreds of books or pamphlets that lays it all out in words and even pictures.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.008170 seconds.