| re: Sounds Dreadful |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 02:35 pm EDT 04/16/20 |
| In reply to: re: Sounds Dreadful - JT 02:24 pm EDT 04/16/20 |
|
You know...it's different, it's something I maybe wouldn't have thought of, but you know what? I've seen 1776 many times cast in the traditional way. There's even a movie to watch if you need a fix of something like that. And there will be many traditional productions in future at all levels.
Assuming this production even happens now, I'm willing to give the creatives a shot to show me 1776 in a different way. It might not work. It might be terrible. (Of course, a traditional production also might not work and/or be terrible.) But it might also make me see something new in a show that I know very well. I wish more revivals were willing to take chances like this and try something new.
So I'm willing to give it a shot and see what they come up with. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Sounds Dreadful - Singapore/Fling 04:41 pm EDT 04/16/20 |
| Next: |
i think a ton of potential audiences have never seen it - Chazwaza 09:21 pm EDT 04/16/20 |
| Thread: |
|
