LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

right for whom?
Posted by: ryhog 09:48 pm EDT 04/21/20
In reply to: Stephen Sondheim 90th Birthday Celebration-Sunday April 16th-To The Producers - ArnoldMBrockman 07:22 pm EDT 04/21/20

What do you think the object of the celebration ought to be? the celebrants? or the celebrated? I would think a painful reminder would be the last thing the celebrated would want on this festive occasion.
reply to this message


re: right for whom?
Posted by: ArnoldMBrockman 08:12 am EDT 04/22/20
In reply to: right for whom? - ryhog 09:48 pm EDT 04/21/20

What Exactly Do You Mean By Painful Reminder. Your Comment Does Not Make Sense. Mr. Sondheim,I Believe Would Be Honored That There Is More To See In The Future. The Music And Lyrics Will
Go On !
reply to this message


re: right for whom?
Posted by: larry13 10:19 am EDT 04/22/20
In reply to: re: right for whom? - ArnoldMBrockman 08:12 am EDT 04/22/20

Why do you capitalize the first letter of your every word? It makes it very annoying to read.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: right for whom?
Last Edit: nyc23 08:44 am EDT 04/22/20
Posted by: nyc23 08:43 am EDT 04/22/20
In reply to: re: right for whom? - ArnoldMBrockman 08:12 am EDT 04/22/20

I think he meant Sondheim might not enjoy hearing a song from a project that has been shelved, which of course is as much conjecture as the original post. I’d point out that historically Sondheim’s work has been largely unfinished when rehearsals start.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: right for whom?
Posted by: ryhog 09:28 am EDT 04/22/20
In reply to: re: right for whom? - nyc23 08:43 am EDT 04/22/20

Yes that is what I meant, and yes it is conjecture. What I took from the original post was that it was "us" focused.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: right for whom?
Posted by: nyc23 09:38 am EDT 04/22/20
In reply to: re: right for whom? - ryhog 09:28 am EDT 04/22/20

Wait... Sondheim’s birthday isn’t about us? How dare he... ;)
reply to this message | reply to first message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.018453 seconds.