Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." | |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 12:00 am EDT 06/28/20 | |
| In reply to: re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." - Ann 07:29 am EDT 06/27/20 | |
|
|
|
| It's one thing for someone to state that the genius of HAMILTON is in the music and lyrics, and that the staging pales in comparison. That's an opinion, and it's valid even if one disagrees. But to state that there is no need for anyone to see a video of the production implies that the visual elements of the show, including the actors' facial expressions, the costumes, the lighting, the staging, and the choreography, don't add anything significant to the experience. To me, that's a ridiculous overstatement. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." | |
| Posted by: Ann 07:08 am EDT 06/28/20 | |
| In reply to: re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." - Michael_Portantiere 12:00 am EDT 06/28/20 | |
|
|
|
| I only object to bringing in someone's intelligence. Everyone makes ridiculous overstatements, even you and me, and I don't think it means we need an intelligent test. But I do think this opinion was expressed in a way to get clicks. And it worked. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." | |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 01:45 pm EDT 06/28/20 | |
| In reply to: re: Unbelievable: "You Don’t Need to Watch Hamilton Everything that’s groundbreaking about the musical is already on the album." - Ann 07:08 am EDT 06/28/20 | |
|
|
|
| Understood. My comment about an intelligence test was meant as a joke, but I should have phrased it differently and focused solely on the content of the article. Also, I guess you could say that my comment was an overstatement in itself :-) I also agree with you about the click bait. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.011056 seconds.