| Wrong about what? He is right about some things (all of which, as I note, are already relatively common knowledge) and wrong about some others. But most of those items are obscured by his successful obliteration of any arguable credibility he may have ever had and the miasma of pathological nonsense that is the most observable characteristic of his essays. Were there valid points lurking somewhere? Maybe, but in a forensics class, he would surely get an "F." |
