LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Andrew Lloyd Webber reviews the CATS movie
Posted by: fosse76 02:35 am EDT 08/04/20
In reply to: re: Andrew Lloyd Webber reviews the CATS movie - Michael_Portantiere 01:47 pm EDT 08/03/20

Movie studios and production companies RARELY allow the original rights holders any concessions. They want full control. So "generally speaking" is almost as good as saying "always." And no, at least as far as the first 4 films, JK Rowling had absolutely no real authority. By the time the first film was made, the series was massively popular, but was only on the third book. They deferred to her quite a bit, but were under no contractual obligation. Her only stipulations were that each book have a separate movie and the cast be British.
reply to this message


re: Andrew Lloyd Webber reviews the CATS movie
Last Edit: JereNYC 01:39 pm EDT 08/04/20
Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 01:36 pm EDT 08/04/20
In reply to: re: Andrew Lloyd Webber reviews the CATS movie - fosse76 02:35 am EDT 08/04/20

But what else could Warner Bros have done at a point where they were embarking on making a franchise based on a projected 7 book series of which only 3 books had been written/published? They either had to have involved Rowling in the process or they risked their films wildly diverging from the books and setting up all the fan sturm und drang that comes with that. Given the twists and turns of Rowling's narrative, there's no way the film makers could have anticipated where she was going with the story and we'd likely have ended up with an entirely different Harry Potter story.

And what's the point of that? It would have turned Harry Potter into a mess of GAME OF THRONES proportions.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.009728 seconds.