LOG IN / REGISTER




re: CAMELOT
Posted by: Chromolume 02:56 pm EDT 08/07/20
In reply to: re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 02:04 pm EDT 08/07/20

I forgot about that line. Yeah. that doesn't play at all anymore, even if Lerner meant (or hoped) that it would be taken with a bit of humor (no matter his own personal views on women).

Is Pellinore actually supposed to be a stand-in for Pickering? The idea that the lead *needs* a sidekick of sorts? (Even Tommy has Jeff, though Jeff - and Pickering - are much more interesting characters.) Maybe they were wrong in assuming Arthur needed that.
reply

Previous: re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 02:04 pm EDT 08/07/20
Next: re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 12:55 am EDT 08/08/20
Thread:
  • re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 12:55 am EDT 08/08/20
  • re: CAMELOT - Erik_Haagensen 03:38 pm EDT 08/07/20 (1)
    • re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 01:50 pm EDT 08/08/20

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.012172 seconds.