| re: CAMELOT |
| Posted by: Chromolume 02:56 pm EDT 08/07/20 |
| In reply to: re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 02:04 pm EDT 08/07/20 |
|
I forgot about that line. Yeah. that doesn't play at all anymore, even if Lerner meant (or hoped) that it would be taken with a bit of humor (no matter his own personal views on women).
Is Pellinore actually supposed to be a stand-in for Pickering? The idea that the lead *needs* a sidekick of sorts? (Even Tommy has Jeff, though Jeff - and Pickering - are much more interesting characters.) Maybe they were wrong in assuming Arthur needed that. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 02:04 pm EDT 08/07/20 |
| Next: |
re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 12:55 am EDT 08/08/20 |
| Thread: |
- re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 12:55 am EDT 08/08/20
- re: CAMELOT - Erik_Haagensen 03:38 pm EDT 08/07/20 (1)
- re: CAMELOT - Michael_Portantiere 01:50 pm EDT 08/08/20
|
