LOG IN / REGISTER




re: Repeating here: Question about Rainbow Rainbow tweets quoted in THE ADVOCATE article
Posted by: ryhog 01:40 pm EDT 08/21/20
In reply to: re: Repeating here: Question about Rainbow Rainbow tweets quoted in THE ADVOCATE article - Michael_Portantiere 01:28 pm EDT 08/21/20

"Why do you suppose that is?"

I "suppose" (and that's all it is) that RR (or his damage control publicist) chose the Advocate and the writer because they would give him a friendly reception. I probably also suppose that RR (or his damage control publicist) chose the specific quotes to use, and may have written the whole damn thing. We have both been around long enough that we know that these things happen. He wasn't going to toss this story to the Times, or Timeout, not just based on reception but also based on readership. TBH if you had asked me if the Advocate still existed, I am not sure I would have said yes. I'm sure it has only a tiny fraction of the number of followers RR has on Twitter. NB that he did not go there.
reply

Previous: re: Repeating here: Question about Rainbow Rainbow tweets quoted in THE ADVOCATE article - ryhog 04:38 pm EDT 08/21/20
Next: re: Repeating here: Question about Rainbow Rainbow tweets quoted in THE ADVOCATE article - Michael_Portantiere 02:30 pm EDT 08/21/20
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.009096 seconds.