re: Chad Kimball Courts Controversy
Last Edit: lordofspeech 04:00 am EST 11/18/20
Posted by: lordofspeech 03:58 am EST 11/18/20
In reply to: Chad Kimball Courts Controversy - JereNYC 01:31 pm EST 11/17/20

There are differing perspectives, at least two that are quite opposed: the Fauci/WHO/Ferguson/mainstream-media narrative from April, and the more holistic perspective exemplified by Doctor Scott Atlas and the doctors subscribing to the Great Barrington Declaration. Neither side has incontrovertible scientific proof, although they each don’t understand or respect the other.

Kimball has every right to make a stand, even one that may have him be cancelled in and by the media, which the article suggests is happening. The popular view is not always the true one (cf., Ibsen’s “Enemy of the People, wherein a protagonist stands up for a radically unpopular scientific thesis which turns out to be true, or Brecht’s “Galileo” or Howard Sackler’s “Semmelweis”).

Previous: re: Chad Kimball Courts Controversy - hugoP 08:12 am EST 11/18/20
Next: re: Chad Kimball Courts Controversy - Singapore/Fling 02:14 pm EST 11/18/20

Privacy Policy

Time to render: 0.024228 seconds.