| re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. |
| Posted by: ryhog 07:16 pm EST 01/26/21 |
| In reply to: re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - Billhaven 07:07 pm EST 01/26/21 |
|
I had my post open for a while due to a call and had not seen S/F's post or yours when I posted.
One more question then: on the record about what? Having posited that the two men had a sex life, who are these people who have interesting observations and what are those observations. I think a lot of things about a lot of people I have worked with in this business and have an almost endless supply of observations about them. My observations do not supply an intellectually valid basis for saying anything. I assure you. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - Singapore/Fling 07:43 pm EST 01/26/21 |
| Next: |
re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - Billhaven 08:19 am EST 01/26/21 |
| Thread: |
|
