| re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. |
| Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 01:08 am EST 01/27/21 |
| In reply to: re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - ryhog 02:21 pm EST 01/26/21 |
|
"Mike Nichols is a fascinating person on so many levels. You would need a very very long biography before I would start to get interested in his sexual history. Or his wigs. Sorry, but neither of those are why this very special artist is having multiple books written about him."
OF COURSE, it wouldn't be details of his "sexual history" that would be of interest (except to those with salacious minds), it would be whether he was in fact a gay or bisexual man who felt he had to completely hide that fact in order to succeed in his career(s), due to the times during which he established his career(s). |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - ryhog 02:21 pm EST 01/26/21 |
| Next: |
re: Harris addresses this in a lengthy footnote on page 115. - ryhog 08:54 am EST 01/27/21 |
| Thread: |
|
