LOG IN / REGISTER




re: Actor’s homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told
Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 11:59 pm EST 02/08/21
In reply to: re: Actor’s homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told - lordofspeech 09:31 pm EST 02/08/21

"I personally think she should be permitted to quit."

This whole story still doesn't make sense to me, as it seems to me she was fired from the show she would have quit anyway because she supposedly didn't understand the character's lesbianism would be made clear, and that's against her religious belief. What makes even less sense to me is your statement that "she should be permitted to quit." Do you mean she should have been allowed to quit without being fired first? If that's what you mean, what would be the difference? If anything, I assume it would normally be better for her financially if she was fired rather than quit. So, can you attempt to explain what you mean?
reply

Previous: re: Actor’s homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told - KingSpeed 10:26 pm EST 02/10/21
Next: re: Actor’s homophobia made her commercially toxic, tribunal told - lordofspeech 01:33 am EST 02/09/21
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.010281 seconds.