|re: Quick point: just on the grammar...|
|Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 04:41 pm EDT 04/01/21|
|In reply to: re: Quick point: just on the grammar... - Michael_Portantiere 03:43 pm EDT 04/01/21|
|It's a very awkward sentence to which my high school English teacher would have surely objected.
The phrase "to let a woman in" should actually be "to let a woman into".
The phrase "willing for a dentist to be drilling" makes absolutely no sense. An individual can not be "willing for" a dentist to do anything -- one can be "willing to have" or "willing to let" a dentist do something like drill or pull a tooth. I think the best way to have a grammatically correct sentence is to rephrase it like this: "I'd be equally willing to have a dentist drill than to let a woman into my life" or "I'd be equally willing to let a dentist drill than to have a woman in my life."
Years ago, an ATC poster tried to rewrite Lerner's lyric. What he came up with was so stilted, it made Lerner's grammatical error much preferable.
|Previous:||re: Quick point: just on the grammar... - Michael_Portantiere 03:43 pm EDT 04/01/21|
|Next:||re: Quick point: just on the grammar... - Michael_Portantiere 11:07 am EDT 04/02/21|
Time to render: 0.047250 seconds.