Maybe true, but did you read the write-up about it? Doesn’t it deserve a place on the list, if for no other reason than its historic role in “blowing the closet door off its hinges” and showing post-Stonewall audiences that gays have always been here? For humanizing gays so beautifully, so relatively soon? I think it absolutely belongs on the list, and the magazine positions its rationale for including it very well.
I don't think anyone disagrees with that, only with the title of this listicle. As I noted, a better title might have been "The Top 10 Gay-Positive Musicals," but that's only one possible suggestion off the top of my head. |