LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers?
Posted by: tmdonahue 08:36 am EDT 07/08/21
In reply to: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - MockingbirdGirl 03:32 pm EDT 07/07/21

The answer to Billington's title question is: Yes. They were both, at various times. They were not, in today's term, "woke," but I don't think you can blame the 1950s and 1960s on them.
reply to this message


re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers?
Posted by: Michael_Portantiere 09:40 am EDT 07/08/21
In reply to: re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - tmdonahue 08:36 am EDT 07/08/21

I would say that R&H were as pretty much as thoroughly "woke" as it was possible for anyone to be at that time -- especially Hammerstein. You CANNOT take people out of their time and expect them to have behaved according to modern-day standards of wokeness (some of which are not universally agreed upon anyway). Not when their time and place was America in the first half of the 20th century.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.009314 seconds.