All That Chat - re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers?

re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers?
Posted by: tmdonahue 08:36 am EDT 07/08/21
In reply to: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - MockingbirdGirl 03:32 pm EDT 07/07/21

The answer to Billington's title question is: Yes. They were both, at various times. They were not, in today's term, "woke," but I don't think you can blame the 1950s and 1960s on them.
reply

Previous:	re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - singleticket 01:06 pm EDT 07/08/21
Next:	re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - Michael_Portantiere 09:40 am EDT 07/08/21
Thread:	re: Rodgers and Hammerstein: cosy box-office bankers or radical trailblazers? - Michael_Portantiere 09:40 am EDT 07/08/21

Time to render: 0.009389 seconds.