Threaded Order Chronological Order
| Really :-) | |
| Posted by: ryhog 11:04 am EST 12/31/21 | |
| In reply to: Not really - dramedy 10:29 am EST 12/31/21 | |
|
|
|
| the evidence, from the 29th, is in the link... not that it matters. |
|
| Link | The old news |
| reply to this message | |
| re: Really :-) | |
| Posted by: KingSpeed 12:08 am EST 01/02/22 | |
| In reply to: Really :-) - ryhog 11:04 am EST 12/31/21 | |
|
|
|
| Thanks ryhog. I knew what I was talking about. | |
| reply to this message |
| Ok, I’ll rephrase: it was news to me | |
| Posted by: dramedy 11:53 am EST 12/31/21 | |
| In reply to: Really :-) - ryhog 11:04 am EST 12/31/21 | |
|
|
|
| So I’m glad of the original post here. I missed the message you linked since it was part of a long chain from a few days ago. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: Ok, I’ll rephrase: it was news to me | |
| Posted by: ryhog 05:17 pm EST 12/31/21 | |
| In reply to: Ok, I’ll rephrase: it was news to me - dramedy 11:53 am EST 12/31/21 | |
|
|
|
| all good now. happy new year (which of course includes a year free of lost posts in long chains. or threads.) :-) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.012212 seconds.