LOG IN / REGISTER




A couple of critics on Company's book, 1995 and 2006
Last Edit: Delvino 11:17 am EST 01/02/22
Posted by: Delvino 11:16 am EST 01/02/22
In reply to: re: My Company rant in general - not targeted to you, kidmanboy - with staging spoilers - Delvino 10:43 am EST 01/02/22

Worth noting, the way the book was described in the first first revival, in 1995

"Though the new production pretends to be timeless, the talk of relationships and commitment forever anchors the show in the 1970's, when sending up such jargon seemed a much wittier endeavor than it does in the 1990's. Mr. Furth's plotless book is no longer startling, but it provides a serviceable frame for the Sondheim music and words." Vincent Canby, NY Times, 10/6/1995

And then:

"The actors are mainly bland, a fault that stings all the worse in the parts of the show that have become dated, both in language (“stewardess,” “grass,” “make it”) and outlook (the young generation doesn’t look at thirtysomethings as the enemy anymore, except maybe when the grown-ups won’t stop bugging them for new MP3s)," Jeremy McCarter, NY Magazine, 11/30/2006
reply

Previous: re: My Company rant in general - not targeted to you, kidmanboy - with staging spoilers - Chazwaza 03:16 pm EST 01/02/22
Next: re: A couple of critics on Company's book, 1995 and 2006 - Chazwaza 03:22 pm EST 01/02/22
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.008957 seconds.