| re: interesting Jennifer Hudson isn't |
| Posted by: JereNYC (JereNYC@aol.com) 03:24 pm EST 02/01/22 |
| In reply to: re: interesting Jennifer Hudson isn't - Charlie_Baker 03:03 pm EST 02/01/22 |
|
| I cannot imagine that anyone is even thinking of doing this movie WITHOUT Cynthia Erivo. Her performance was the entire raison d'etre of the revival. And she's managed to transition into a film career in the years since. Her deal is probably just not signed, sealed, and delivered yet, hence no announcement. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: interesting Jennifer Hudson isn't - Live_From_London 05:04 pm EST 02/03/22 |
| Next: |
re: interesting Jennifer Hudson isn't - TheOtherOne 04:13 pm EST 02/01/22 |
| Thread: |
|
