Threaded Order Chronological Order
| Okay, but... | |
| Last Edit: MockingbirdGirl 06:06 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
| Posted by: MockingbirdGirl 06:06 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
| In reply to: re: Diana is not a movie, it is a filmed stage production, and it's awful that they'd include it in the Razzies - Chazwaza 06:01 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
|
|
|
| ... the fact remains that so long as the "legit" awards shows consider them eligible, they are fair game for those awards the spoof them as well. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Okay, but... | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 07:37 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
| In reply to: Okay, but... - MockingbirdGirl 06:06 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
|
|
|
| Look at the other nominees. The Razzie's have become primarily a thing to punch-up at stars who need to be taken down a notch, who are popular to hate (for right or wrong reasons at the time), or good actors who have given notably bad performances or stars who chose terrible projects and did badly in them. Nominating a supporting actor from the filmed stage production of Diana against people like Mel Gibson, Ben Affleck, Nick Canon, and Jared Leto - and in the films they got their Razzie noms for -- is just ridiculous and inconsistent. There are certainly worse featured male performances in movies last year than those 4 famous people this year... the goal was picking on famous and successful actors making bad choices and giving hilariously subpar performances. Not actually nominating the worst of all films or filmed-things eligible. They nominated Diana to be funny. But i think for the people nominated it's cruel, especially since they didn't even give performances FOR film, they gave them for stage, and in a universally agreed upon mediocre-to-bad musical. But sure, technically, they're within their jurisdiction to nominate Diana. Good for them. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: Okay, but... | |
| Posted by: JAllenC3 03:08 pm EST 02/08/22 | |
| In reply to: re: Okay, but... - Chazwaza 07:37 pm EST 02/07/22 | |
|
|
|
| I mostly agree with you, but they did give these performances for film. It was filmed without an audience for the purpose of a Netflix release and they knew that the camera was there. If they didn't modulate their performances for the camera that's on them. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.014605 seconds.