| re: Why did shows move theaters so much in the past? |
| Posted by: Singapore/Fling 03:03 pm EST 03/10/22 |
| In reply to: re: Why did shows move theaters so much in the past? - KingSpeed 02:45 pm EST 03/10/22 |
|
But one answers the other. Shows moved for the same reason that shows nowadays do - they lose their theater or they want to downsize chief among them - but it doesn't happen nearly as often now (in the past twenty years, I can think of "August: Osage County", "Mama Mia!", "The Lion King", and "Beetlejuice", sure I'm missing a few), because, among other reasons, the costs have gotten so much more expensive and because sets are much more elaborate.
TLDR: They moved more back then because it was easier. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Why did shows move theaters so much in the past? - BroadwayTonyJ 03:43 pm EST 03/10/22 |
| Next: |
also Chicago revival, and Cabaret (Mendes revival, first one) - Chazwaza 08:31 pm EST 03/10/22 |
| Thread: |
|
