All That Chat - re: SPOILER

ATC Main Newest Posts FLAT MODE SHOPPIN' On the Boards

re: SPOILER
Posted by: Ann 11:51 am EDT 05/15/22
In reply to: SPOILER question re: Case for Existence of G_d - goodfriendnj 11:30 am EDT 05/15/22

They were the daughters. They talked about the two fathers - one knew about them both, and the other didn't, since she had to leave him at age 2.
reply

Previous:	SPOILER question re: Case for Existence of G_d - goodfriendnj 11:30 am EDT 05/15/22
Next:	re: SPOILER - jwilson 11:55 am EDT 05/15/22
Thread:	re: SPOILER - jwilson 11:55 am EDT 05/15/22 (14) MORE SPOILER - Genealley 03:41 pm EDT 05/15/22 (13) re: MORE SPOILER - lowwriter 11:23 am EDT 05/16/22 (8) Right? - Genealley 12:30 pm EDT 05/16/22 (7) No, wrong, as has already been explained in this thread - ryhog 12:37 pm EDT 05/16/22 (6) Really...if you can't help but be "instructive" and snarky, why not just try to avoid my posts, k? - Genealley 02:34 pm EDT 05/16/22 (5) Oh no, being instructive on a public forum, what a sin - Singapore/Fling 12:11 am EDT 05/17/22 It's simple. If you post something that's wrong, people are going to correct you. - ryhog 03:20 pm EDT 05/16/22 (3) Wait...how did you get a copy of the script? - Genealley 05:02 pm EDT 05/16/22 (2) re: Wait...how did you get a copy of the script? - ryhog 05:18 pm EDT 05/16/22 (1) As the Baker says: No More - Genealley 08:13 pm EDT 05/16/22 re: MORE SPOILER - Seth Christenfeld 03:44 pm EDT 05/15/22 (3) I have another question SPOILER - schauspieler 07:55 pm EDT 05/15/22 (2) re: I have another question SPOILER - NeoAdamite 08:30 pm EDT 05/15/22 (1) re: I have another question SPOILER - schauspieler 09:43 pm EDT 05/15/22

Time to render: 1.627640 seconds.