| re: That’s crazy |
| Posted by: ryhog 10:24 pm EDT 06/20/22 |
| In reply to: re: That’s crazy - writerkev 09:42 pm EDT 06/20/22 |
|
| I realize Dramedy used the expression first, but I don't understand what either of them is talking about. The only obligation to disclose (and pay) anything is between the parties to the deal. I can't fathom what's wrong with a producer having their press agent announce recoupment: it's something to be proud of, and also something that is good PR for both producer and production. (To answer the other question, not announcing may just be a personal preference, or not as important to some, just as throwing away money on full page color Sunday ads in the Times is not everybody's idea of a smart move. Maybe some have good reasons, maybe some don't.) But I don't know what anyone can add to the discussion by citing to what a known fraudster may or may not have done almost 30 years ago. Nothing in a press release has anything to do with a producer's obligations to investors. I'd just like to see clear discussion of relevant matters. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: THE LEHMAN TRILOGY -- Recouped or Did Not Recoup? - ryhog 02:18 pm EDT 06/21/22 |
| Next: |
re: That’s crazy - jgerard 01:03 pm EDT 06/21/22 |
| Thread: |
|
