LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: It's all gone backwards
Last Edit: Chazwaza 05:43 am EDT 08/26/22
Posted by: Chazwaza 05:42 am EDT 08/26/22
In reply to: It's all gone backwards - Singapore/Fling 07:49 pm EDT 08/25/22

I think that you should seek out the original, which is all I can say on that.

For all the issues the book had originally, I think they made the characters less dimensional in the revision. I also think a strength of the original book is that it does *not*, to my memory of my experiencing it, give you a crash course on how they got there... it sets up the question of how and then, you know, spends two hours working backwards to show you through scenes and songs. Opening on the graduation I think helped enormously with how the show and tone and characters get introduced and how the audience is eased into the jolting concept of how the story will be told who the people we are going to spend 2/3 of the play with before the become wonderful and in no way irredeemable personalities. I also think there are aspects to the graduation opening that were changed in or for previews that helped even more.

And your example of "That Frank" vs "Rich and Happy" is spot on, not to mention that as a song TF pales in comparison to R&H, and a great microcosm of how shortsighted the rewrites were. And while I am basically in favor of the entire original vs the revisions, there are things I like in the revisions... I do quite like "Growing Up", though I'm not sure that it feels like the same score (even though it's based on the same stuff), which maybe is the point and makes it work even more. But I don't like all the Gussie stuff that comes with it, so it's an imbalance.

It's so sad to me that George Furth preferred people see this show with this revised script, if anything I think his work comes off notably worse. Not to mention how much they throw out the window any good will or credit they win with an audience, or just the impact of the youth juxtaposition, when the show is performed, as originally intended, with a young cast and the energy and vibe of that to juxtapose the sourness of the people and circumstances. From the major to the minor of the conceptualization and execution of the rewrites, it's just such a mistake to me, even if there maybe have been 25% of it that were improvements or great additions/edits. But I have to guess that I'd review the versions and say 25% is being generous.
reply to this message


re: It's all gone backwards
Posted by: Chromolume 12:55 pm EDT 08/26/22
In reply to: re: It's all gone backwards - Chazwaza 05:42 am EDT 08/26/22

It's so sad to me that George Furth preferred people see this show with this revised script, if anything I think his work comes off notably worse.

I tend to wonder if it was all much more a very complicated ugly emotional reaction to the process and reception of the original show, than a preference for the revision.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.008577 seconds.