LOG IN / REGISTER




re: My take on INTO THE WOODS
Posted by: portenopete 09:19 am EST 11/18/22
In reply to: re: My take on INTO THE WOODS - Revned 01:11 am EST 11/18/22

I also really enjoyed reading your thoughts, probably because I feel a kinship with the sentiment you expressed about the coarsening of a show that is chock-a-block with Sondheim's trademark insight and wit and that I think is best served by a subtler approach.

One of the best things about Robert Westenberg's original Cinderella Prince was his extreme humourlessness. I suppose Chuck Wagner took more or less the same approach, but he was possessed of genial, California surfer looks, whereas there was something about Westenberg's physiognomy- those broad, bony planes on his face and his deep-set eyes- that gave him a seriousness that seemed effortless. I saw him as George Seurat, as well as in both the live and PBS versions of Into the Woods- and I suspect that was his general style in most things he did.

Gavin Creel- lovely though his voice may be- has always had a lightness about him that is about as far from Westenberg's stolid presence as I can imagine. As his fame and the audience adoration of him have grown over the years, it seems whenever I see him he is spending at least half of his performance slyly glancing out at the audience and grinning, the way a child in a school play would search out his parents and give them a little wave. (Andy Karl is a spectacular buffoon and in the right role- particularly Bruce Granit in On the Twentieth Century- he has been absolutely perfect.)
reply

Previous: re: My take on INTO THE WOODS - Revned 01:11 am EST 11/18/22
Next: re: My take on INTO THE WOODS - WaymanWong 02:34 pm EST 11/21/22
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.016017 seconds.