LOG IN / REGISTER




re: There is Sondheim-sanctioned precedent for "raven hair"
Posted by: AlanScott 12:47 am EST 12/15/22
In reply to: re: There is Sondheim-sanctioned precedent for "raven hair" - sirpupnyc 09:19 pm EST 12/14/22

That's a good question to which I don't know the answer. I don't think it was mentioned long ago when this was written about in The Sondheim Review, and I must admit to feeling too lazy at the moment to go searching for it. I suppose it's possible that section was simply cut.

Of course, I have no idea what they're going to do in this production. Just wanted to mention that the question had come up at least once in the past, and Sondheim provided a change.
reply

Previous: re: There is Sondheim-sanctioned precedent for "raven hair" - sirpupnyc 09:19 pm EST 12/14/22
Next: re: There is Sondheim-sanctioned precedent for "raven hair" - dlh 03:51 am EST 12/15/22
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.024380 seconds.