Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY | |
| Posted by: AlanScott 06:57 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
| In reply to: re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY - Chromolume 06:11 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
|
|
|
| Yes, I cannot fathom why anyone thinks Merrily would be better moving in chronological order. Think of the ending. If anything would make an audience unsatisfied, that would. I don't think that anything you could put after that, if the idea is that it wouldn't actually end as it starts now (or with the 1980 graduation scene), could possibly be satisfying. If it were positive, it would seem sappy. If it were negative, it would seem depressing and pointless. And, yes, it would cease to be Merrily We Roll Along. As you say, it all goes back to Hart and Kaufman. I put Hart first because the play was his idea. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY | |
| Posted by: NewtonUK 07:44 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
| In reply to: re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY - AlanScott 06:57 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
|
|
|
| Years ago I was directing Pinter's BETRAYAL, a play I like quite a bit. As an exercise one day, we ran the scenes in chronological order - what a mess! Everything was obvious, and fake, and pretty awful Pinter knew what he was doing! The interesting thing about the musical MERRILY is that it takes some things from the musical - but leaves the best behind. Kaufman and Hart being MUCH better writers than George Furth, The high school graduation scene (Hills of Tomorrow) was needed because of the , as it turns out, bad idea of casting all 20 somethings - so they had to begin with a scene where they were all playing their own ages, more or less. Then jump forward, then slowly roll back in time. The play MERRILY (with a cast of almost 100) opened with a scene in 1934, at a rich rich party in Long Island, which ends with an argument and a brutal confrontation. Much more powerful than anything in the musical. And the nit goes on like that, scene after scene until the bright beginning where it all started. Walter Abel, one of the stars was 36. The play had a rave review to end all rave reviews in the Times, from Brooks Atkinson. The play was definitely darker than the musical ever has been. And it broke your heart. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 05:42 am EST 12/18/22 | |
| In reply to: re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY - NewtonUK 07:44 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
|
|
|
| The graduation scenes weren't "needed because" of the "bad" idea to cast 20somethings... it is an inherent part of the concept for this musical, and isn't there to justify anything, in fact it is pretty justified on its own terms by how brilliantly it works emotionally and dramatically. It was one of the best, most effective aspects of the original and it's key to why and how the show was written, and it's a damn shame they cut it. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY | |
| Posted by: AlanScott 08:20 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
| In reply to: re: The Case Of The Curious MERRILY - NewtonUK 07:44 pm EST 12/17/22 | |
|
|
|
| I am tempted to comment on several things, but I will just question whether you've seen a production of the revision. I imagine you have. I would not say that the opening scene of the original play is darker than the opening scene (following the title song) of the revised version of the musical. It goes to the exact same place. What do you think is darker about the play? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.018885 seconds.