| re: SLIH actually decreased 17% | |
| Posted by: Ncassidine 04:27 pm EST 12/20/22 | |
| In reply to: re: SLIH actually decreased 17% - NewtonUK 03:59 pm EST 12/20/22 | |
|
|
|
| I mean, AF has been running (and presumably losing money) for a lot longer. I don't think that's a good comparable. | |
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: SLIH actually decreased 17% - NewtonUK 03:59 pm EST 12/20/22 |
| Next: | re: SLIH actually decreased 17% - ryhog 10:33 pm EST 12/20/22 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.111095 seconds.