LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Posted by: Delvino 04:54 pm EST 12/20/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - chrismpls 02:40 pm EST 12/20/22

Ah. Well considered. Makes sense. More than Green’s oblique diagnosis. Thanks.
reply to this message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Posted by: singleticket 12:42 pm EST 12/21/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - Delvino 04:54 pm EST 12/20/22

What is oblique about Green's review other than the line you excerpted out of context?
reply to this message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Last Edit: singleticket 01:25 pm EST 12/21/22
Posted by: singleticket 01:18 pm EST 12/21/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - singleticket 12:42 pm EST 12/21/22

I agree with this from Green's review:

Complications like that are unpleasant for absolutists; Guirgis’s needling of victimhood may please as few people on the left as his needling of Rudolph Giuliani may rile those on the right. Along with anyone who can’t tolerate profanity, which is basically the play’s linguistic glue, they will have a hard time warming to a playwright who isn’t interested in telling us what’s right. He only wants to show us what’s real.

Whether Guirgis's representation of the characters' world is based on personal experience or entirely made up his refusal of both miserablism and finger-wagging in favor of a fond but unsparing comic tone makes the play's characters feel more real than most plays about people who are struggling economically under the effects of class and racism.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Posted by: ryhog 10:37 pm EST 12/20/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - Delvino 04:54 pm EST 12/20/22

I sense that Jesse had something to say but obscured it because he hadn't quite figured out what that was.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Last Edit: garyd 11:34 pm EST 12/20/22
Posted by: garyd 11:31 pm EST 12/20/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - ryhog 10:37 pm EST 12/20/22

You may be right. However, my take-away from reading that sentence is that Green sensed the actors, at times, but not continuously, and not to the detriment of the production as a whole, regressed, perhaps due to personal emotions regarding the thematic elements, to proseltyzing rather than allowing the characters being portrayed elucidate those elements. In other words, they wanted to make sure that the audience was "getting it". I don't know as I have yet to see the play but, if my interpretation of the sentence is correct, I think it is a valid critical observation by Green and one with which I may or not agree once I have. Actually, this is one of reasons I , in the past, made it a point not to read reviews of theatre I had every intention of seeing. Reading them afterwards is always much more fun.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Posted by: ryhog 12:16 am EST 12/21/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - garyd 11:31 pm EST 12/20/22

I think your reading is likely correct but I guess I would then ask, why did Green right it so vaguely. You did not seem to have much trouble articulating it. I've seen the play in both New York iterations. (I vaguely think I saw the original twice but I am too lazy to check.) I did not pick up on this sense personally but maybe that has something to do with what I brought with me to the current production.
reply to this message | reply to first message


re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review
Last Edit: garyd 01:05 am EST 12/21/22
Posted by: garyd 12:59 am EST 12/21/22
In reply to: re: A line in Green's "Riverside and Crazy" review - ryhog 12:16 am EST 12/21/22

I suppose I did not find it as vague as you and others and I may represent a singular minority. I simply see it as a comment on the acting and, possibly ,the direction. Of course, it could also be something that he brought to the production. We all bring, I think, certain predilections to art whether we realize it or not. Perhaps it is one of the tenets of art to challenge those predilections. I hope so. (Of course, in this case we are critiquing the critique, not the play, and that is okay as well. Criticism is an art form)
reply to this message | reply to first message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.037253 seconds.