Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: Hair | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 06:19 pm EST 12/27/22 | |
| In reply to: Hair - Amiens 08:59 am EST 12/27/22 | |
|
|
|
| Unless we're calling all nudity on stage exploitation, I don't think any that are part of the concept of the play can be called that. Though for what it's worth, both Hair and Take Me Out can be done without the nudity, but I think for both it is inherent to the show and it's worth doing. However it is MUCH more present and visible in Take Me Out. And while of course people are going to mention and write about the nudity in any show with nudity... the show didn't market itself as sexual or nude at all. But yes totally agree the Promises Promises logos were 100% trying to sell that aspect of the show... in a misleading way... it doesn't really reflect the actual show. |
|
| reply to this message |
| Take Me Out | |
| Posted by: Amiens 06:50 pm EST 12/27/22 | |
| In reply to: re: Hair - Chazwaza 06:19 pm EST 12/27/22 | |
|
|
|
| How can you do Take Me Out without the nudity? There are 2 scenes that specifically take place in a locker room shower. Though I agree with you that the nudity there is integral to the script and thus not exploitive. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: Take Me Out | |
| Posted by: Chazwaza 08:07 pm EST 12/27/22 | |
| In reply to: Take Me Out - Amiens 06:50 pm EST 12/27/22 | |
|
|
|
| I mean i guess that it could be altered to not need them nude in the shower, it could be in the locker room with towels or underwear (couldn't it in theory? I don't remember what happens in those scenes tbh)... but maybe not. And that isn't doing the play as written. But the play was conceived for it to have the nudity. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.015369 seconds.