re: Fascinating? More like awful
Last Edit: writerkev 02:29 pm EST 02/01/23
Posted by: writerkev 02:29 pm EST 02/01/23
In reply to: Fascinating? More like awful - JAllenC3 01:52 pm EST 02/01/23

I'm taking a guess, but I would imagine some recent contests (Deirdre O'Connell's win, perhaps) ended up having a ludicrously tiny pool of voters demining the outcome because they only allowed those who had seen all nominees. They might have had a major award chosen by a total of 25 people, and 11 voted for the winner.

Again, speculation, but I imagine it might have looked something like that.

Previous: I meant that word sarcastically! nmi - Ncassidine 02:53 pm EST 02/01/23
Next: Well... but, good! Why should you be able to vote for an award with 5 candidates if you haven't seen all 5? - Chazwaza 05:44 pm EST 02/01/23

Privacy Policy

Time to render: 0.025218 seconds.