All That Chat - re: Well... but, good! Why should you be able to vote for an award with 5 candidates if you haven't seen all 5?

re: Well... but, good! Why should you be able to vote for an award with 5 candidates if you haven't seen all 5?
Posted by: writerkev 06:01 pm EST 02/01/23
In reply to: Well... but, good! Why should you be able to vote for an award with 5 candidates if you haven't seen all 5? - Chazwaza 05:44 pm EST 02/01/23

I don’t mean to suggest it’s any fairer this way or defending the rule change, just offering a suggestion for why they might want a change.
reply

Previous:	Well... but, good! Why should you be able to vote for an award with 5 candidates if you haven't seen all 5? - Chazwaza 05:44 pm EST 02/01/23
Next:	re: Fascinating? More like awful - oddone 05:19 pm EST 02/01/23
Thread:

Time to render: 0.010561 seconds.