LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: Hate to break it to you…
Posted by: Singapore/Fling 11:54 am EDT 03/31/23
In reply to: re: Hate to break it to you… - keikekaze 02:26 am EDT 03/31/23

There's a huge difference between being a contributing writer and an originating writer, but they are all writers, and they all have a form of authorship on the musical.

And while you're heaping scorn on Mendes et al here, you're forgetting that the changes made to "Cabaret" led to a revival that injected new life and popularity into the musical, running twice as long as the original on Broadway, and substantially longer than the 1987 revival. That script, which has become the default for new productions, has a lot of smart changes - and a few clumsy ones - that attune the material to a contemporary audience (and at this point, we'd do well to have another round of edits to fully bring Cliff out of the closet).

This kind of work isn't just for the ego of a director, it's for the benefit of the musical itself.
reply to this message


re: Hate to break it to you…
Posted by: AlanScott 06:04 pm EDT 03/31/23
In reply to: re: Hate to break it to you… - Singapore/Fling 11:54 am EDT 03/31/23

I don't know the answer to this: Did Mendes actually write any dialogue or lyrics? My impression is that he did not, but I'm not sure.

Prince felt that he should have received royalties as one of the authors, and been credited as director of the original production in revivals, and he was sorry that he didn't put this in the contracts.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.019623 seconds.