| re: The rules may have changed in 20 years |
| Posted by: ryhog 01:16 pm EDT 04/09/23 |
| In reply to: re: The rules may have changed in 20 years - oddone 12:16 pm EDT 04/09/23 |
|
| I think you are reading too much into this. It is a committee most if not all of the members of which have a lot on their plates. It is also a committee without a fixed amount of work to do each year but that knows what it has pending well in advance. It is also worth noting that the only reason to meet more than once is so that super long agendas can be avoided. (That said, there is a school of thought among some that releasing the decisions as they are made disadvantages earlier opening shows because it potentially allows later shows a strategic opportunity that they did not have, and there could come a day when, even if there are multiple meetings, there would only be one announcement.) Finally, between scheduling conflicts causing some to back out and the high number of conflicts of interest (both requiring the different dance of having alternates replace them), getting this committee functioning sometimes seems like a game of whac-a-mole. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: The rules may have changed in 20 years - oddone 12:16 pm EDT 04/09/23 |
| Next: |
re: The rules may have changed in 20 years - oddone 09:49 pm EDT 04/09/23 |
| Thread: |
|
