Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: scoot1er 04:25 pm EDT 04/09/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - Likeitlots 09:22 am EDT 04/09/23 | |
|
|
|
| Having been a Tony nominator, I can tell you that the nominating committee has nothing to do with eligibility. Eligibility is determined by the administration committee. Your statement beginning "Of course, every nominating committee is different..." is therefore irrelevant. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: Likeitlots 08:36 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - scoot1er 04:25 pm EDT 04/09/23 | |
|
|
|
| How smug. What you say may be factually true, but I am pretty sure you understood the spirit of what I was saying. You might have corrected me with "actually, it's the administration committee..." rather than being quite so dismissive. Dare I say that your Tony nominator past is also... irrelevant. But do let me correct myself: Of course every administration committee is different..... | |
| reply to this message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: scoot1er 09:17 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - Likeitlots 08:36 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| Words matter. What you said was wrong and needed to be corrected. If you think correcting you was smug, that's your problem. But thanks for correcting yourself. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: Likeitlots 10:00 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - scoot1er 09:17 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| I did not say that your correction was the problem. It’s your tone that makes it smug. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: twiceroyale 11:10 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - Likeitlots 10:00 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| hence the problem with email! How can the tone of an email being read guarantee the tone of the water's intention? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: twiceroyale 11:11 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - twiceroyale 11:10 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| writer's intention | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: scoot1er 09:20 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - scoot1er 09:17 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| Oh, and by saying that my having been on the Tony nominating committee is irrelevant is wrong, as I was and am in a position to know how the nomination and eligibility rules work. (Now, I am being smug, deliberately so.) | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: NY NY Score | |
| Posted by: Likeitlots 09:56 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
| In reply to: re: NY NY Score - scoot1er 09:20 am EDT 04/10/23 | |
|
|
|
| Nothing like someone who, when their rudeness is pointed out, doubles down. Your “credentials” are like saying that because I have English degrees I can write. It may be factually true but the degree is irrelevant and my mentioning it is all ego. You could have stated the committee facts without smugly announcing your past role, which again, I find irrelevant even if it’s true. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.050721 seconds.