| There is a rule, and that rule doesn't really speak to most of what is being discussed in this thread |
| Posted by: ryhog 11:34 pm EDT 04/11/23 |
| In reply to: re: Yet Disgraced was regarded as a new play. - Delvino 10:18 pm EDT 04/11/23 |
|
The rule focuses on:
(1) is it a "classic"? "
(2) is it a part of the historical repertoire?
(3) is it a part of the popular repertoire?
Clearly it is not (1) or (2). Perhaps (3) is open to interpretation but the data on that is readily available. I confess that I do not know how often Riverside has been performed regionally and also that I am too lazy to look. Yes of course the committee can ignore its own rule (or, more likely, follow it with an interpretation that is counter to that of those who disagree with it, but the stuff being discussed above in this thread really seems like an unlikely detour. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Yet Disgraced was regarded as a new play. - writerkev 05:42 am EDT 04/12/23 |
| Next: |
Wiki lists some of the productions - dramedy 12:09 am EDT 04/12/23 |
| Thread: |
|
