| re: This is the artistic choice of the authors | |
| Posted by: student_rush 07:24 pm EDT 05/25/23 | |
| In reply to: re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - Singapore/Fling 06:57 pm EDT 05/25/23 | |
|
|
|
| It’s genuinely ludicrous to value “union rules” over authorial intent in any entertainment medium. We aren’t talking about producers skirting regulations to save money, we are talking about the tone and language of a piece of theatre, and how design and performance stems from within to bring the text to life. Authors are part of the labor force — just ask the WGA. But everything starts with authorial intent. “Union rules” should be, I don’t know, the tenth most important thing when creating and critiquing art. For Christ’s sake, “union rules” are the things that so rapidly inflate line-item run costs for producers, most significantly load-in costs that can single-handedly make the difference between deciding to mount a show in NYC or in the UK. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - ryhog 11:10 am EDT 05/26/23 |
| Next: | re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - ryhog 08:10 pm EDT 05/25/23 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.141143 seconds.