| re: This is the artistic choice of the authors | |
| Last Edit: Singapore/Fling 07:57 pm EDT 05/25/23 | |
| Posted by: Singapore/Fling 07:55 pm EDT 05/25/23 | |
| In reply to: re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - student_rush 07:40 pm EDT 05/25/23 | |
|
|
|
| Logic has left the building. The musicians are being devalued because they have been excised as an employee of the show, which is… a musical. You get that, right? And you get that this being a musical makes your argument about a play - which is not a musical - entirely extraneous. The better argument would be how would you feel if you saw a play that featured exclusively motion capture or pre-recorded actors, and thus didn’t employ actors, because it “was the concept”? Look, if Byrne wants prerecorded music, that’s great, so long as the show pays the original musicians a weekly fee for using their performance in the show. Otherwise, the producers have found a way around paying musicians for a musical, and if they do that, who knows what they will cut next. |
|
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - selmerboy 08:55 pm EDT 05/25/23 |
| Next: | re: This is the artistic choice of the authors - ablankpage 08:58 am EDT 05/26/23 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.059624 seconds.