re: A point that you may be missing.
Posted by: AlanScott 03:51 pm EDT 05/26/23
In reply to: re: A point that you may be missing. - NewtonUK 03:38 pm EDT 05/26/23

NewtonUK, I think that's not altogether correct. For decades, the minimum for nonmusicals was four. If a play had more than a certain amount of live music, the union might decide that it should be classified as a musical and might demand that the minimum for musicals be hired, but that happened very rarely. An example would be The Tempest, way back in 1945. Later, if the rule was still in place, I imagine Marat/Sade would have been classified as a musical according to the union. But otherwise, even in the biggest houses (and the Broadway, the Uris/Gershwin, and the Majestic have all sometimes housed plays), the minimum was four for nonmusicals.
reply

Previous: re: A point that you may be missing. - NewtonUK 03:38 pm EDT 05/26/23
Next: re: A point that you may be missing. - ablankpage 03:27 pm EDT 05/27/23
Thread:

Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.025000 seconds.