Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: AlanScott 06:21 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - kidmanboy 06:16 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| AFAIK, that would be OK with the union. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: selmerboy 11:17 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - AlanScott 06:21 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| That is most definitely not what the union wants. My guess is that the Union would accept a special situations agreement, and that they would rather put 8-10 musicians in playing jobs than have 19 union members as walkers. This is about jobs on this show, yes, but it’s also about the future of and - believe it or not - the integrity of the Broadway Musical. Seriously. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Last Edit: SCH 09:04 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| Posted by: SCH 09:01 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - selmerboy 11:17 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| When you speak of the integrity of the Broadway musical, shouldn't you also be speaking of artistic integrity? As those who have seen other iterations of this show can attest, there are very valid artistic reasons for using prerecorded tracks for this particular show. The entire conceit of the show is predicated on it, and the sound and style of the tracks (which are essential to the conceit of the show) cannot be reproduced with live music. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: selmerboy 05:07 pm EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - SCH 09:01 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| Of course the sound can be reproduced by live musicians. It's not electronic music. It was recorded by real musicians playing real instruments. And, as I've said before, all you have to do is step into Six, Hamilton, And Juliet, or any number of other shows to see that virtually any style of music can be played live. The "artistic integrity" argument from the producers is a dodge. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: ryhog 06:30 pm EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - selmerboy 05:07 pm EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| There's the rub: You manifestly do not understand the first thing about record producing and yet you pretend you do. (And you are not alone.) The "sound" of a recording cannot be reproduced by live musicians because it is impossible to proceed live in the manner that a record is recorded, edited, and produced in a studio. And when you say otherwise, it's clear you just don't understand. It's like saying that you saw Rigoletto last night and the string parts were played by kazoos but it "of course" was the opera. It is also like saying that you saw the film of West Side Story and it was just the same as seeing it on stage. It has NOTHING to do with the genre of music; it is about the way the sound is delivered to the audience's ears. As I have said before, this topic is a tangent to the issue that prompted this increasingly weird thread, but the bottom line is that if someone discerns what karaoke is, having it played by live musicians in a theatre is a fraud. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: ryhog 07:39 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - AlanScott 06:21 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| They would be ok with it but that misses the point. The union agreed to a procedure for reducing the number below the minimum. It is a procedure that has been used a number of times. That procedure, of which the producer and GM were well aware, is ordinarily put in motion as soon as the theatre is secured, and involves a committee (made up of both sides plus quite esteemed neutrals) that is tasked to determine an appropriate number of musicians in the circumstances. Here, that procedure was NOT initiated on a timely basis for reasons that are not clear but appear to be somewhat delusional on the production's part. Based on what is being reported, the process is clearly not going to be completed in time. If not, will 802 picket? (I would think yes.) Will anyone cross the picket line? (I would think no.) If that's the case then, considering what they have spent already, I suspect they will be forced to cough up the contract minimum, which they undoubtedly cannot afford. Another unnecessary mess. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: Singapore/Fling 12:50 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - ryhog 07:39 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| At this point, I wouldn’t see the show at all. Even if a deal is stuck, these producers knew what they were doing and clearly thought they would get away with it. It’s disgusting, a clear intention to not pay artists, and is in line with the horrendous behavior we’re seeing in Hollywood right now. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: Hair 11:34 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - Singapore/Fling 12:50 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| HOW DARE THESE ARTISTS NOT WANT TO CREATE ART THAT FOLLOWS YOUR DIRECTIVES INSTEAD OF THEIR OWN??? | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: ryhog 01:04 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - Singapore/Fling 12:50 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| You can of course make your own decisions but your narrative does not comport with the one that has now been made public by the parties. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: Singapore/Fling 10:06 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - ryhog 01:04 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| You’re right - I trusted the poster who said that the Times article didn’t have anything new in it, and so missed that Luft has been talking with the union since February. Still, they are losing the PR game here. Get ahead of the story, people. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Posted by: ryhog 10:46 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - Singapore/Fling 10:06 am EDT 05/31/23 | |
|
|
|
| Well that explains the disconnect. And yes, this is not being handled well. And I think this is another area where having unattuned people in charge of marketing and publicity results in the absence of a clear message. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
| re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... | |
| Last Edit: AlanScott 08:14 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
| Posted by: AlanScott 08:11 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I've just looked at the credits for the 2016 cast recording... - ryhog 07:39 pm EDT 05/30/23 | |
|
|
|
| Just answering a question in the post to which I responded. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.061336 seconds.