| re: NYT now has reporting on the 'Here Lies Love' situation |
| Posted by: FortPeck 03:51 pm EDT 05/31/23 |
| In reply to: re: NYT now has reporting on the 'Here Lies Love' situation - Hair 11:35 am EDT 05/31/23 |
|
You've made a similar comment a few times. Maybe you're not understanding that these "rules" aren't just observed out of convention, like "no-white-after-Labor-Day", by Victorian-era schoolmasters with unhealthy fixations. They are contractual provisions that are being enforced by the parties who negotiated them. This is apparently the price of admission for contracting with a Broadway house. If the producers don't like it for artistic reasons (which I am very sympathetic too since it's a karaoke show), or they can't make the math work, they can find a different venue.
Or maybe you're being deliberately obtuse cuz that's fun for you. :)
It is shocking to me that they are this close to proposed opening and are still working this out... |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: NYT now has reporting on the 'Here Lies Love' situation - Hair 11:35 am EDT 05/31/23 |
| Next: |
re: NYT now has reporting on the 'Here Lies Love' situation - lordofspeech 04:34 pm EDT 05/30/23 |
| Thread: |
|
