Threaded Order Chronological Order
| Gendered or Non-Gendered Acting Categories | |
| Last Edit: BroadwayTonyJ 12:58 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
| Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 12:47 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
| In reply to: re: Gendered award categories (NPR) - Ann 08:42 am EDT 06/02/23 | |
|
|
|
| In 1947 when the Tonys debuted, the acting categories were gender neutral. There were 4 winners for OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE: Ingrid Bergman, Helen Hayes, Jose Ferrer, Fredric March. The sole winner for OUTSTANDING MUSICAL PERFORMANCE was David Wayne. In 1948 and 1949 there were separate categories for lead male and female actors in Plays. The categories for MUSICAL PERFORMANCE; NEWCOMER; and/or SUPPORTING in Plays were gender neutral. In 1950 all acting categories for plays, musicals, leads, and supporting were separate for male and female actors. The Oscars (going back to their debut in 1927-28) have always had separate categories for male and female actors. I've never seen stated reasons for separate acting categories for male and female actors, although I'm sure that in the early decades white males clearly dominated. I imagine that began to change significantly in the 1940's. Today I don't think women would have any trouble competing against men. I think it's more about what audiences want. I suspect that audiences prefer a single winner in acting categories and not multiples ones, but that's just my opinion. I think you would actually have to poll audiences and actors themselves to determine what's the best way to proceed when it comes to gender. I can't imagine the Oscars ever going to gender neutral acting categories, not after 96 years of a tradition that audiences have accepted worldwide. Of course, the Tonys are a completely different animal. The audience is much, much smaller and more specialized. Nevertheless, the devil is in the details when it comes to introducing change without driving audiences away. What about an idea like a single new acting category, something like Best Gender Nonconforming Performer in a Play or Musical? It would cover all roles, musical, play, lead, and supporting. It would be an option for nonbinary, transgender, and gender nonconforming actors who do not feel comfortable competing in gendered specific categories. Just a neutral suggestion -- I'm not pushing an agenda, just looking for some common ground in order to find consensus. |
|
| reply to this message |
| re: Gendered or Non-Gendered Acting Categories | |
| Last Edit: Ann 01:06 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
| Posted by: Ann 12:55 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
| In reply to: Gendered or Non-Gendered Acting Categories - BroadwayTonyJ 12:47 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
|
|
|
| I don't think that's a good idea, but it is not my place to decide what non-gender-conforming (I hope that's an accepted term) across would like. My issues with separate categories comes from my feeling that they're separate because people think women can't compete, poor things, and I think we can. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: Gendered or Non-Gendered Acting Categories | |
| Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 01:53 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
| In reply to: re: Gendered or Non-Gendered Acting Categories - Ann 12:55 pm EDT 06/03/23 | |
|
|
|
| Interesting. I thought that in the past you supported a change to non-gendered acting categories to promote inclusivity and/or representation for everyone. I took that to mean for nonbinary performers. I find it hard to believe in 2023 that anyone still believes that women can't compete with men for something as trivial as acting awards. My life experience has certainly proved that is not the case. As a novice high school teacher in 1970, I reported to a veteran female instructor. As a 2nd lieutenant in the U.S. Army, at times my superior officer was a female captain. In 1987 when I began work in purchasing for a paper company, my customer service manager was a woman. Years later when I was in sales and sales service, the chairman of our board of directors was also female. I think many, possibly most, female actors would rather be the sole winner of the Tony for Best Actress in a Musical rather than be one of two or three winners in a Non-Gendered Performer in a Musical category. It would probably give her more leverage in a negotiation for a higher salary. The same would apply for a male actor. At least that's what I've been told. I found the term "gender nonconforming" on Wikipedia. |
|
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.018354 seconds.