LOG IN / REGISTER



Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: No, in this context, "they" is NOT plural
Posted by: ryhog 12:47 pm EDT 06/05/23
In reply to: re: No, in this context, "they" is NOT plural - Chromolume 11:05 am EDT 06/05/23

Reserving the right to research more (and be wrong), I don't think they are analogous. I think the royal "we" (aka the majestic plural) in its native form is the king speaking as the monarchy. And I think that when our friends use the expression, it is a form of jokey condescension in the sense of speaking for everyone. I think the circumstance with non-binary "they" is largely that it takes a little getting used to. But as I say I could be wrong.
reply to this message


"they"
Last Edit: BroadwayTonyJ 01:11 pm EDT 06/05/23
Posted by: BroadwayTonyJ 01:09 pm EDT 06/05/23
In reply to: re: No, in this context, "they" is NOT plural - ryhog 12:47 pm EDT 06/05/23

Maybe "they" for a nonbinary individual is more like the "editorial we" instead of the "royal we". The "royal we" is reserved for a monarch, but anyone can use the "editorial we" depending on the circumstance.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.013950 seconds.