Threaded Order Chronological Order
| re: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? | |
| Posted by: KingSpeed 01:24 pm EDT 07/18/23 | |
| In reply to: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? - Mmac72 10:07 am EDT 07/18/23 | |
|
|
|
| I'm confused. There are tickets available for this show for $110. The highest is around $300. I don't understand your "why not start them at $500" reaction. | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? | |
| Posted by: aislestorm 01:43 pm EDT 07/18/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? - KingSpeed 01:24 pm EDT 07/18/23 | |
|
|
|
| Because it starts a dangerous precedent for ticket prices both off-Broadway and on Broadway. If they can get away with charging $300, what’s next? $400 to see “Days Of Wine and Roses”? | |
| reply to this message |
| re: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? | |
| Posted by: KingSpeed 03:06 pm EDT 07/18/23 | |
| In reply to: re: I mean, at this point why not just start them at $500 apiece? 1K apiece? - aislestorm 01:43 pm EDT 07/18/23 | |
|
|
|
| Sondheim's last show seems to be more of a special event and thank heavens they aren't charging $500 because they probably could have and still sold out. In the end, I appreciate that there is always a cheap option in this case, $110/ticket. | |
| reply to this message | reply to first message |
Time to render: 0.018014 seconds.