Threaded Order Chronological Order

re: The Encores "Not Pal Joey"
Posted by: ryhog 02:16 pm EDT 10/06/23
In reply to: re: The Encores "Not Pal Joey" - marknyc 03:04 am EDT 10/06/23

1. No matter how clever or original, no title is the property of the person who wrote it. Accordingly, an estate (or anyone else) lacks any basis for asserting a right to a title.
2. I dare say there have been many times more examples of creators doing terrible things. Anyone can protest anything: that's free speech, but meaningless. And using Sondheim as an example not only is of no greater import but is also ironic because both living and dead he has done precisely what he was criticizing.Finally, I think you have a causation issue.
3. There is quite a bit of presumption in saying that estates are not respecting the trust they have been given. That assumes the point you are trying to prove. I think most decedents have given their literary executors trust because they feel they will act consistent with the best interests that they have set out for the estate. See Sondheim.
reply to this message


re: The Encores "Not Pal Joey"
Posted by: marknyc 07:17 pm EDT 10/06/23
In reply to: re: The Encores "Not Pal Joey" - ryhog 02:16 pm EDT 10/06/23

I'm not assuming anything. There are numerous examples of estates allowing works to be butchered to make more money. This has been discussed numerous times.

I obviously know that the estate has the legal right to do whatever it wants, no matter how egregious. But speaking up can have an effect, as Sondheim's editorial proved.

Again, I have no problem with adaptations - have at it. But - again - tossing out a book completely is not an adaptation, and the ethically correct and respectful thing to do is to retitle the work, as was done with Crazy For You.
reply to this message


Privacy Policy


Time to render: 0.016919 seconds.